Sunday, October 30, 2011

Second Draft of OWS Article

On October 5th 2011, groups of people continued to gather in Zuccotti Park in support of the movement Occupy Wall Street. Hundreds of people were either chanting with a human microphone, holding up their personal testimonies on cardboard signs, or assisting one of the many relief stations set up to support the protest. On this same day the Workers Unions of New York City were set to march to demonstrate their full support of the movement.

One of the many groups of people who have shown up today are a group of senior citizen women known as the, “Granny’s for Peace.” “It’s not what we’re hoping to achieve, it’s what everyone is hoping to achieve I’m hoping this will be, the end of this economic system, that’s what I think. And the brilliance of this is that has provided a way for everyone to participate to change something together. I’m old enough to remember many times when people came together to march against Vietnam and the biggest difference, to then is that there is no generation gap here,” said, Jenny, 63-year-old social worker and a member of “Granny’s for Peace”. Those at the protest who are over 30 years younger than the, “Granny’s” share the same desire to rectify injustices committed by the corporate grip on government.

Since September 1st a variety of residents from all around the United States have responded to calls by a Vancouver nonprofit publication known as Adbusters, and hacking collective Anonymous, which requested all who were dissatisfied with the Financial Crisis/UNCAP of 2008 and the ongoing effects of that crisis to peacefully protest in the confines of the financial district of Manhattan. Nearly a month later the movement has gained momentum, through the form of NYPD resistance and arrest of protesters as well as thousands of satellite protests constantly stemming from locations all over the world.

Genesis of the Movement

Drawing their inspirations from the Arab Spring movement, specifically the occupation of Tahrir Square in Egypt, Adbuster attempted to emulate these populist protests by employing the same tools to organize and raise awareness surrounding their movement.

On July 13, 2011 Ad Busters issued a forum that generated the initial proposal to non-violently petition against the continued abuses of the financial system in place in the United States. “Then our model was to attack the system like a pack of wolves. There was an alpha male, a wolf who led the pack, and those who followed behind. Now the model has evolved. Today we are one big swarm of people,” said, Raimundo Viejom, a student of Pompeu Fabra University, who synthesized the meaning of the occupation. This quote was used on an original post of Adbusters to help sum up the position of the Wall Street protesters which supports the idea that, “Wall Street, the Financial Gomorrah of America,” will not adjust their attitudes their own. Its location at the epicenter of capitalist commerce unifies with a single cause hoping to force the authoritative political system of the United Sates to directly deal with all who were unhappy with the current motions of government.

AdBusters originally wanted 20,000 people to go to lower Manhattan to set up a communal center with a kitchen and tents and Occupy Wall Street for a few months. A goal of gathering here is to bring attention to, the plight of the 99%. The 99% are those who fear unevenly distributed tax and income system that has been widening in the past few decades. The influence of corporations over those who govern in Washington is seen by AdBusters as directly comparable to the unending power that former President Muhammad Mubarak had over the Egyptian people. The only unifying principle was the removal of his power which had the approval of nearly 300,000 people.

The first responses to AdBusters call for a change were from the New York General Assembly. They first met on August 2nd in Bowling Green Park to speak out against “ongoing probank” and “anti people cutbacks,” and to help establish a plan for the actual protest on September 17th. Throughout August the GA had ongoing meetings about collective thinking for solutions and called for food donations. On August 13th, AdBusters confirmed that two off shoot protests would occur in Spain and San Francisco and called for more movements to grow. Three weeks after this AdBusters posted about involvement from protesters in London, Milan, Lisbon, Madrid and Athens.

Starting on September 1st a trial occupation for New Yorkers occurred in the financial district to perform a peaceful and legal demonstration in preparation for the actual occupation. When the 17th came 5,000 people marched from Bowling Green Park to 1 Chase Plaza before the NYPD blocked their path. Following the police disruption the OWS movement relocated to the privately owned Zuccotti Park to fully practice a non violent and demonstrative protest that had been talked about three months before.

Reasons for Protesting (Economic Backstory)

The causes for Occupy Wall Street are rooted in economic problems that have plagued the United States since the Great Depression of the 1930s. After the events of the Depression the New Deal was instated and banks were regulated to prevent any future failures. Sixty years after the Depression, banks fell through another period of deregulation that resulted in an increased the amount of loans distributed to customers who could never repay them as well as the trading of more derivative assets. Consumer friendly banks gained the same abilities that had originally been designated to investment banks. Excessive loaning resulted in an uneven balance in the money maintained by the banks and the loans they were distributing to most of their customers. The costs of purchasing a home waxed because people were buying houses without the money to repay the mortgages banks gave out. The inability repay home ownership loans, caused the, “housing bubble,” to burst in 2008 and the costs of buying a home rapidly lowered. This resulted in former President George W. Bush passing the Troubled Asset Relief Program that would ensure the safety of banks and the corporations that helped maintain them. This bail out was almost completely paid for by the tax dollars of US citizens and those in charge of these corporations and banks went untouched from this economic downturn.

The Current Status of the Protest

Since September 17th, the occupation at Zuccotti Park has become a fully functioning community center for those participating in the movement. “There are people who are good at cooking who cook for us. There are people who are very knowledgeable with medicine who are healing us, there are musicians who play for us, there are artists creating art. There are people who are good speakers who are helping us organize. So you see, everyone here is allowed to access their strengths and let that be their work,” said Monica, 25-year-old traveling musician. This sentiment is displayed with the tents set up for the purpose of providing medicines and aid against the cold, a food station with a variety of donations of cold, hot, and dried foods, as well as speakers who hope to help shepherd a cause. Media outlets and politician such as Herman Cain and Michael Bloomburg have criticized the movement for its disorganization, but some protesters only hope to build and build. “Everything here rose organically out of the chaotic state. Western society has been the experiment. Hypothesis first then execution. We’ve been working pretty successfully, although it’s still very crude organization we’re trying to fine tune because we threw ourselves into this situation and now we’re trying to find a system to emerge out of this,” said, Fred Panpozi, 32 years old and unemployed.

Monday, October 24, 2011

Very rough draft of my story need help with ending

“This is the American Autumn, which has pretty much sprang forth from the Arab Spring, pretty much the same thing. And that’s why I’m here,” said, David Stevenson, 60 year old Real Estate agent from Connecticut. Since September 17, a variety of residents from all around the United States responded to calls by nonprofit and online organizations such as Adbusters and Anonymous, which requested all who were dissatisfied with the Financial Crisis of 2008 and the ongoing effects of that crisis to peacefully protest in the confines of the financial district of Manhattan. This protest is unique to the United States because its nature resides in an issue that inevitably produces ramifications for all people connected in someway to the economic system of the country. Therefore, it is a class issue, not racially or sexually driven. Stevenson and thousands of others are stationed at Zucotti Park with the intention of using civil disobedience to drive those in powerful positions fiscally and politically to stop turning their heads when there are economic problems that cannot be avoided as they have been for centuries.

On July 13, 2011 the Vancouver non-profit consumer advocate Ad Busters issued a forum that generated the initial proposal to non-violently petition against the continued abuses of the financial system in place in the United States. “Then our model was to attack the system like a pack of wolves. There was an alpha male, a wolf who led the pack, and those who, followed behind. Now the model has evolved. Today we are one big swarm of people,” said, Raimundo Viejo, Pompeu Fabra University. This quote was used on the original post to help sum up the only way that the system referred to as, “Wall Street, the Financial Gomorrah of America,” could be confronted. Attempts for a compromise to take place will only suffice if unified with a single cause in a location that would force the authoritative political system of the United Sates to directly deal with all who were unhappy with the current motions of government. AdBusters originally wanted 20,000 people to confine themselves in lower Manhattan to set up a communal center with a kitchen and tents and Occupy Wall street for a few months. A goal of gathering here is to bring attention to, “Wall Street the Financial Gomorrah of America,” the ultimate disturbance to a nation generally viewed as a democratic foreground. Influence of corporations over those who govern in Washington is seen by AdBusters as directly comparable to the unending power that former President Muhammad Mubarak had over the Egyptian people. With only ultimatum of the protesters at Tahrir Square being to remove Mubarak, the unified determination of nearly 300,00 people proved impossible to ignore.

Egypt’s’ change of regime was one of the many branches of the Arab Spring movement that had started to come into fruition in late 2010. The call for changes in longtime regimes that have existed throughout the Islamic world in the Middle East, had also received boosts in publicities because of the output of information by digital media mediums. “We use Facebook to schedule the protests, Twitter to coordinate, and YouTube to tell the world,” said, a female activist from Cairo via Twitter. These three mediums were essential when Internet users from all around the world sought out constant updates about changes in the government of Egypt, Libya and other spring nations. AdBusters continuous posts about the need to Occupy Wall Street often end with a hope that this movement will slowly emulate the mechanics of the Arab Spring.

Following the initial announcement on July 13th a people’s general assembly came together on August 2nd on 4:30 at the north end of Bowling Green Park to correspond with the “Debt-Ceiling Deadline,” that bankers had proposed. Students, union activists, and people with other affiliations came together to discuss how the deficit that has burdened the United States could be directly linked to theft of wages through excessive taxing, the forced removal of pensions and social security assets. “We did not have to let them walk with just a simple pay back. They should have been forced into loan modification and made to give back to the people who saved their business by working with the customers to mange their debt obligations,” said, Gregg Rule, Senior Vice President of Portfolio Group and a financial advisor for Morgan Stanley + Smith Barney. Liability for banks stems from the financial turmoil that is a direct result of deregulation beginning in the early 1980s. Jimmy Carter’s Depository Institutions Deregulations and Monetary Control Act of 1982 expanded the lending power of banks as well as increased the deposit insurance limit from $40,000 to $100,000. This sudden increase in laisez faire economics had led banks to gain a renewed interest in real estate loans and speculative lending. In Nov of 1999, former President Bill Clinton put into action the Gramm Leach Billey Act that repelled a portion of the 1933 Glass Steagle Act that decreased the discrepancies between consumer friendly commercial banks and investment banks only looking for an increase in revenue. With the loss of regulations banks throughout the 1990s stimulated an expansion in the mortgage industry and home ownership increased rapidly. Along with the growing deficit, the deregulation of the banking industry became hazardous when those who took out mortgages on their homes had no ability to pay for what had been purchased with money owed to failing banks. By the mid 2000s failure of the market put citizens of the country at odds with the banking industries who were instrumental in causing the economic meltdown. Corporations such as Merrill Lynch and Chase Bank had been bought out as a result of the 2008 Troubled Asset Relief Program that former President Bush passed to ensure the safety of companies feeling the worst side effects of the mortgage crisis. With the bail out of these businesses, there was a general consensus to tax the corporations responsible for generating this massive fiscal downturn. The constant deregulations that still exist in investment industries allow practices to occur where those who aren’t protected by corporate safety nets cannot escape taxes that are helping pay for the $700 billion dollar bail out from the TARP legislation. On August 10th, after the growth of the General Assembly to movement with manifesto, the hacking advocate group Anonymous dedicated themselves to the purpose of vindicating all responsible for the economic spiral.

Anonymous call for any one who can to come together and, “flood Wall Street. Setup Tents, kitchens, and peaceful barricades and occupy Wall Street for a few months.” A sentiment of peaceful civil disobedience was constantly promoted by Anonymous to show that through a massive communication to the oppressor without the use of violence is the only way to be taken seriously. On September 7, AdBusters announced the necessity for other countries,

Sunday, October 2, 2011

Journal 4


When reporting news about an event that has taken place it is crucial to have pieces of information relating to the story continually validated. Sources that provide journalists with the context material for their piece also help establish a belief from readers in what is being written. However, at times reporters will craft stories around only small parts of sources or will merely refer to a resource rather than accessing the full potential of roots of information. Articles in the Guardian, New York Times, and the Washington Post all require sources to back up the content of the stories. Although, the writers for each these three papers obtain roots for the information in news pieces, different correspondents have unique ways of utilizing sources.


Charlie Savage wrote, "Even Those Cleared of Crimes Can Stay on F.B.I's Watch List," for the New York Times. Savage reports on how official government documentation states that even acquitted terrorists will always hold a place on the F.B.I's watch list for active terror threats. Within the lede of the online article a direct link to the F.B.I. document is included. By directly allowing readers to view the primary source for the articles context, Savage has given readers the opportunity to interpret the main root of the piece for themselves. Savage dissects the contents of the document in his report by appropriating information that has other sources and people reacting in response to specific rules and regulations presented in the testimony. One of the interpreters of the document includes Timothy J. Healy, the head of the F.B.I.'s Terrorist Screening Center. Healy is quoted as stating that the FBI has a detailed based method for choosing who will be put onto the watch list. However, when Savage provides direct information directly from the document which shows that, "reasonable suspicion," from an accused terrorist or non citizen is enough to put a person on a watch lists, it allows readers make their own sense of officially stated information rather than relying on one of the creators of the document being scrutinized.


In Owen Bowcott's, "Palestinian activist wins compensation over detention in UK," the imprisonment of Palestinian activists Shieikh Raed Salah is covered. Bowcott uses minimal direct references to a source at the start of the article and only recounts how Salah was arrested and moral sentiments surrounding the issue. The only direct statements in the piece are small segments of much longer longer accounts. The brief quotes were taken from Salah himself and statements from the home secretary and Border patrol officials and only used in the context of a paragraph to enhance the persuasiveness of the article. Bowcutt, took words such as, "not conductive to the public good," from the home secretary and " confined without lawful authority," and "false imprisonment," from Salah for the purpose of coating his own notions on the news with direct small bits of information from those who have created the news and were affected by it. This use of sources is effective for the purpose of having those involved with the news help enhance notions that the writers is suggesting about how the British government deals with whom they perceive as threats.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/sep/30/palestinian-activist-compensation-detention-uk

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/28/us/even-those-cleared-of-crimes-can-stay-on-fbis-terrorist-watch-list.html?_r=1&hp

Saturday, October 1, 2011

Journal 3



News reporters often include words or sentiments in their stories that give the reader a potentially jaded way to look at an issue. Certain words written by these writers only allow readers to view skepticism on the news issue. However, there are reporters who at time use words that highlight a negative notion purely. Both the Guardian UK and the New York Times have provided articles that presents cynicism as well as skepticism.

Sean Michaels from the Guardian UK drafted the article, "Brian Wilson rules out reunion with the Beach Boys," to let readers know why the founder of the Beach Boys will not reunite for a world tour in celebration of the groups 50th anniversary. Within the first few paragraphs of the article a cynical notion is already addressed. At the end of the first paragraph Michaels asserts that Brian Wilson will not go on tour with his former band mates without providing a quote before stating that information. The second paragraph begins with Michaels insisting that Brian Wilson's, "decision," to not partake in a tour will, "certainly disappoint," Al Jardine another former member of the group. Without knowing how Jardine actually feels about the matter Michaels insisted that the former Beach Boy would be genially upset by Wilson's choice.

Cynicism exists most strongly in the beginning of the second to last paragraph when the author states that Wilson is only interested in being paid to participate in a tour. "…Money's not the only reason we made our records, but it does hold a place in our lives," said Wilson to which the author skewed as implying that Wilson only wants his cheque.

In the article New York Times, "E.P.A. Is Longtime Favorite Target For Perry," writers John M. Broder and Kate Galbraith address how Rick Perry continually causes problems for himself with the Environmental Protection Agency. The writers do not contort quotes or apply sentiments of pessimism when discussing Perry's issues with environmental law. However, the article allows readers to maintain a healthy amount of skepticism by providing helpful background information about Perry and his history with the E.P.A. Through a direct statement by the vice president of the American Lung Association readers learn that Texas and several other states had been under control of federal laws that enforced environmental regulations about toxic emissions. Another quote by a professor of environmental law at the University of texas Law School provides readers with information that explains that toxic emissions from Texas, "…so much higher than everyone else." With information given about Texas's problem with abiding with environmental laws the writers are able to educate their readers without applying notions of pure cynicism.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2011/sep/29/brian-wilson-beach-boys?intcmp=ILCMUSTXT9388

https://myaccount.nytimes.com/auth/login?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/30/us/politics/epa-is-perrys-favorite-target.html&OQ=Q5fQ72Q3dQ32Q26Q68Q70